<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>M-4.biz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1</link>
	<description>M4 &#124; info. insight. inspiration. &#124; Marketing. Messaging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook/ Twitter Posts ignored? Here&#8217;s why: (graphic)</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/facebook-twitter-posts-ignored-heres-why-graphic/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-twitter-posts-ignored-heres-why-graphic</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/facebook-twitter-posts-ignored-heres-why-graphic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the best times to post on Facebook and Twitter for maximum impact? Mind 4 marketing in Dallas uses the latest research to determine optimum posting times. Here&#8217;s the cheat sheet. Researchers have determined the best readership comes when readers are involved. Basically, after they have cleaned out their junk mail and right before or after lunch. Logical isn&#8217;t it? It should be. Too many people post at their convenience instead of their readers. Evenings. Weekends. Fringe times. This is nothing new. Most major news and PR experts know the news cycle runs Monday through Friday for maximum impact. Absolute worst time to post? Friday afternoons. Might as well head home early and way till Monday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/M4best_time_to_post1.jpg"><img src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/M4best_time_to_post1-300x281.jpg" alt="" title="Print" width="300" height="281" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-123" /></a><br />
What are the best times to post on <a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a> for maximum impact?  <a href="http://mind4marketing.com">Mind 4 marketing</a> in Dallas uses the latest research to determine optimum posting times.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the cheat sheet.</p>
<p>Researchers have determined the best readership comes when readers are involved. Basically, after they have cleaned out their junk mail and right before or after lunch.  Logical isn&#8217;t it?  It should be.</p>
<p>Too many people post at their convenience instead of their readers.  Evenings. Weekends. Fringe times.</p>
<p>This is nothing new. Most major news and PR experts know the news cycle runs Monday through Friday for maximum impact.</p>
<p>Absolute worst time to post?  Friday afternoons. Might as well head home early and way till Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/facebook-twitter-posts-ignored-heres-why-graphic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of a tech bubble.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/anatomy-of-a-tech-bubble/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=anatomy-of-a-tech-bubble</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/anatomy-of-a-tech-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wallstreet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billion dollar club is white hot. Instagram, the photosharing app with zero income sells to Facebook for $1 Billion. Apple stock hovers at $650 a share. Facebook set to IPO at $100 Billion. Do these funny numbers sound familiar? In a recent New York Times article, the intimate relationship between Instagram, Facebook and Twitter sure seemed a little too cozy for comfort. They shared engineers, advisors, investors and even the same fraternity at Stanford. In the heat of the internet gold rush, the excitement of Billion dollar overnight wins and massive valuation for these social sharing sites makes everyones pulse race. But is it real? The theory is that these deeply dimensional personal records- in the case of Facebook-ones friends, habit, likes and interactions creates a valuable record for --who exactly? They would tell you Advertisers. Mobile phone sellers. Car companies. Financial services firms. That's in theory. In reality, its all future potential. Valuations. Speculation. Harvard researchers years ago developed a theory based on this type of bandwagon investment know as the greater fool theory. As long as there is a greater fool willing to bet on more gain in an overpriced market, the market works. But when no greater fool exists-or folks finally wise up--the market tanks. I have yet to hear of a global advertiser so enamored with the power of social media that is makes this Ad driven model pay off. Sure its growing- but it seems more like a hungry investment community looking for something to get the Trillions in sidelined investor dollars back into the market. Image from Jean-Paul Rodrigue/Wikimedia Commons Read more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

The billion dollar club is white hot.  Instagram, the photosharing app with zero income sells to Facebook for $1 Billion. Apple stock hovers at $650 a share. Facebook set to IPO at $100 Billion.

Do these funny numbers sound familiar?

In a recent New York Times article, the intimate relationship between Instagram, Facebook and Twitter sure seemed a little too cozy for comfort.

They shared engineers, advisors, investors and even the same fraternity at Stanford.

In the heat of the internet gold rush, the excitement of Billion dollar overnight wins and massive valuation for these social sharing sites makes everyones pulse race. But is it real?

The theory is that these deeply dimensional personal records- in the case of Facebook-ones friends, habit, likes and interactions creates a valuable record for --who exactly?  They would tell you Advertisers. Mobile phone sellers. Car companies. Financial services firms. That's in theory.  

In reality, its all future potential. Valuations. Speculation.

Harvard researchers years ago developed a theory based on this type of bandwagon investment know as the greater fool theory.  As long as there is a greater fool willing to bet on more gain in an overpriced market, the market works. But when no greater fool exists-or folks finally wise up--the market tanks.

I have yet to hear of a global advertiser so enamored with the power of social media that is makes this Ad driven model pay off.  Sure its growing- but it seems more like a hungry investment community looking for something to get the Trillions in sidelined investor dollars back into the market.


 Image from Jean-Paul Rodrigue/Wikimedia Commons
 <a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/anatomy-of-a-tech-bubble/" class="more-link">Read more [...]</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/anatomy-of-a-tech-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sneakernomics:  The Amazing Profit In Running Shoes.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-economics-of-running-shoes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-economics-of-running-shoes</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-economics-of-running-shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adidas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reebok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running shoes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Picture16.png"><img src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Picture16-300x197.png" alt="Nike: The Economics of a Running Shoe." title="The Economics of a Running Shoe." width="300" height="197" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-98" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-economics-of-running-shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History of Apple.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/history-of-apple/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=history-of-apple</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/history-of-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/History-of-computing-apple-300x156.png" alt="" title="History of Apple computing" width="300" height="156" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-95" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/history-of-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple facts.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/apple-facts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apple-facts</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/apple-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adfreak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; Current % of American homes with one or more Apple products. &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Apple ownership by Household income. &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Current concentration of Apple ownership across the USA. &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; % of households with children that own Apple devices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-84" title="macstats-04" src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/macstats-04-300x214.png" alt="% of American Homes with 1 or more Apple products." width="300" height="214" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Current % of American homes with one or more Apple products.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-85" title="macstats-02" src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/macstats-02-300x214.png" alt="% of homes with Apple products by income." width="300" height="214" /></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-86" title="Room to grow." src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/macstats-03-300x214.png" alt="Concentration of Apple ownership across the the USA." width="300" height="214" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Apple ownership by Household income.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Current concentration of Apple ownership across the USA.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-87" title="macstats-05" src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/macstats-05-300x214.png" alt="% of households with children that own Apple devices." width="300" height="214" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>% of households with children that own Apple devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/apple-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The distressing dilemma of The Hunger Games.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-distressing-dilemma-of-the-hunger-games/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-distressing-dilemma-of-the-hunger-games</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-distressing-dilemma-of-the-hunger-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talent zoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is a movie a reflection of real life? What have our children had to consume over the last ten years that has made a story like The Hunger Games entertaining? It’s much to digest. The world of Harry Potter gave kids a hero whose parents were no longer around and where using your wits empowered them against evil. The Hunger Games have taken a step--a big step--farther, where the lone youth must battle for survive requiring the killing of other kids. No matter how much righteousness and validation this can be framed in, the fact is--the movie is about kids killing kids. What was the tipping point of this? I believe it started with the events of September 11th. Painful, apocalyptic scenes that saturated the TV screen and seared into the minds of all of us. Then came Columbine. The duck and cover drills of the past seem mild compared the the regular lockdowns that have been part of our kids school life for the last 20 years. The craft and moviemaking of The Hunger Games is first class. The production values are amazing as this futuristic world is created and we journey through it with the young Katniss Everdeen. They did it right. Establishing her hunting talent as basic to survival justify her skills. The bleak condition her family endures and their hopeless plight validate her intent. But a disturbing leap occurs when a story of film is based on youth battling one another to the death. Yes, it’s fantasy. Yes, it's science fiction. The fact remains that the requirements of the story are that kids must kill kids to win leaves you with a really disturbing feeling. The question really is--do we draw a line? Is there a line? Does making subject matter like this into entertainment neutralize negative effects or amplify them? Ask kids and they will tell you the books illustrate the deep regret and futility of the acts. They will tell you the genetically-altered computerized dogs are the really frightening thing in the movie. Maybe Read more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

When is a movie a reflection of real life? What have our children had to consume over the last ten years that has made a story like The Hunger Games entertaining?

It’s much to digest.

The world of Harry Potter gave kids a hero whose parents were no longer around and where using your wits empowered them against evil.  The Hunger Games have taken a step--a big step--farther, where the lone youth must battle for survive requiring the killing of other kids.  No matter how much righteousness and validation this can be framed in, the fact is--the movie is about kids killing kids.

What was the tipping point of this?  I believe it started with the events of September 11th.  Painful, apocalyptic scenes that saturated the TV screen and seared into the minds of all of us.  

Then came Columbine. The duck and cover drills of the past seem mild compared the the regular lockdowns that have been part of our kids school life for the last 20 years.

The craft and moviemaking of The Hunger Games is first class. The production values are amazing as this futuristic world is created and we journey through it with the young Katniss Everdeen.  
They did it right. Establishing her hunting talent as basic to survival justify her skills.  The bleak condition her family endures and their hopeless plight validate her intent.  But a disturbing leap occurs when a story of film is based on youth battling one another to the death.  Yes, it’s fantasy. Yes, it's science fiction. The fact remains that the requirements of the story are that kids must kill kids to win leaves you with a really disturbing feeling.

The question really is--do we draw a line?  Is there a line?  Does making subject matter like this into entertainment neutralize negative effects or amplify them?

Ask kids and they will tell you the books illustrate the deep regret and futility of the acts.  They will tell you the genetically-altered computerized dogs are the really frightening thing in the movie. Maybe <a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-distressing-dilemma-of-the-hunger-games/" class="more-link">Read more [...]</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/the-distressing-dilemma-of-the-hunger-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SXSW 2012. Success by the numbers.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/what-you-missed-at-sxsw-2012-success-by-the-numbers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-you-missed-at-sxsw-2012-success-by-the-numbers</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/what-you-missed-at-sxsw-2012-success-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sheer critical mass of tech hotshots at SXSW is proven in the demographics. The numbers are staggering. In just one week, according to the Huffington Post, SXSW attendees bring $167 Million to the Capitol City. The venture/start up math may validate the investment. By all accounts, the attendees represent the cutting-edge technology geeks of their respective companies. In one conversation, I spoke with a key designer for Disney interactive, a New York Ad creative and a Montreal Music reviewer--all with networks of savvy tech hungry friends and affiliates. Where else can a prospective web enterprise put themselves in the thick of the Blogisphere...in the executive suite, and smack in the faces of Silicon Valley and Manhattan’s venture capital elite. Last year, the start up Foursquare picked up more than 500,000 users after their SXSW debut. By this year, they had floated a possible $100 Million sale to Facebook (and, at the very least $20 Million in new funding which the two founders took home $2+ Million each.) Not bad for a couple years work and a few weeks of tequila and tacos in Austin. What do we learn from all of this? That impressions are a valuable commodity. Impressions among social media influencers are perhaps even greater. If the average Facebook user has 120 friends, 184 Linkedin contacts and 27 twitter followers, anecdotally, its probably safe to imagine that that the tech-forward have easily 10x that many. These same influencers tweeted over 500,000 times during the event (source: Simply measured). That’s a lot of influence--potentially. Ironically, one of of those tweets was mine--commenting that the life of that message was about 1/200th of a second as the flow of comments, complaints and critiques were broadcast nonstop. Which might explain the proliferation of handbills, strolling promoters and other old school analog messaging. There’s something comforting about physically seeing a message and the comfort of seeing Read more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

The sheer critical mass of tech hotshots at SXSW is proven in the demographics. 

The numbers are staggering.  

In just one week, according to the Huffington Post, SXSW attendees bring $167 Million to the Capitol City.  

The venture/start up math may validate the investment. By all accounts, the attendees represent the cutting-edge technology geeks of their respective companies.  

In one conversation, I spoke with a key designer for Disney interactive, a New York Ad creative and a Montreal Music reviewer--all with networks of savvy tech hungry friends and affiliates. 

Where else can a prospective web enterprise put themselves in the thick of the Blogisphere...in the executive suite, and smack in the faces of Silicon Valley and Manhattan’s venture capital elite.   

Last year, the start up Foursquare picked up more than 500,000 users after their SXSW debut. By this year, they had floated a possible $100 Million sale to Facebook (and, at the very least $20 Million in new funding which the two founders took home $2+ Million each.)  Not bad for a couple years work and a few weeks of tequila and tacos in Austin.

What do we learn from all of this?  That impressions are a valuable commodity. Impressions among social media influencers are perhaps even greater. 

If the average Facebook user has 120 friends, 184 Linkedin contacts and 27 twitter followers, anecdotally,  its probably safe to imagine that that the tech-forward have easily 10x that many. These same influencers tweeted over 500,000 times during the event (source: Simply measured). That’s a lot of influence--potentially.

Ironically, one of of those tweets was mine--commenting that the life of that message was about 1/200th of a second as the flow of comments, complaints and critiques were broadcast nonstop. Which might explain the proliferation of handbills, strolling promoters and other old school analog messaging. There’s something comforting about physically seeing a message and the comfort of seeing <a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/what-you-missed-at-sxsw-2012-success-by-the-numbers/" class="more-link">Read more [...]</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/what-you-missed-at-sxsw-2012-success-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SXSW 2012-What a difference a year makes.</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-what-a-difference-a-year-makes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sxsw-what-a-difference-a-year-makes</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-what-a-difference-a-year-makes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether it was the the economy or logic, a year of tough business has taken its toll at South By Southwest (SXSW). Last year, the streets were overflowing with promotions for everything from Fox’s Sons of Tucson TV show (failed) to just about any word you could attach .com, .org or .net. This year was decidedly more reserved. It seems that marketers have determined that accountability pays the bills. Instead of random awareness, nearly every event required a check-in, Facebook sign-in , email invite or some other tangible data capture. The rewards were worthwhile- open bars, live music and promo swag- but more importantly, qualified leads and business synergy. As CNBC puts it “For most attendees, the sit-downs, dinners and parties are more important than the event&#8217;s programming because of the business relationships they foster.” The most dynamic places were still the lobby bars at the Four Seasons, the Driskell and the W. Interviews, deals and celebrity-encounters happening from dawn to..well, dawn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/sxswcrowd.png"><img src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/sxswcrowd-300x168.png" alt="SXSW Lobby crowd 2012" title="sxswcrowd" width="300" height="168" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-62" /></a></p>
<p>Whether it was the the economy or logic, a year of tough business has taken its toll at South By Southwest (SXSW).</p>
<p>Last year, the streets were overflowing with promotions for everything from Fox’s Sons of Tucson TV show (failed) to just about any word you could attach .com, .org or .net. This year was decidedly more reserved. It seems that marketers have determined that accountability pays the bills.  </p>
<p>Instead of random awareness, nearly every event required a check-in, Facebook sign-in , email invite or some other tangible data capture.</p>
<p>The rewards were worthwhile- open bars, live music and promo swag- but more importantly, qualified leads and business synergy.  As CNBC puts it “For most attendees, the sit-downs, dinners and parties are more important than the event&#8217;s programming because of the business relationships they foster.” </p>
<p>The most dynamic places were still the lobby bars at the Four Seasons, the Driskell and the W. Interviews, deals and celebrity-encounters happening from dawn to..well, dawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-what-a-difference-a-year-makes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SXSW 2012  What did you miss?</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-2012-what-did-you-miss/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sxsw-2012-what-did-you-miss</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-2012-what-did-you-miss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The annual tech pilgrimage to Austin known as SXSW interactive did not turn out to be the launch pad for the next big thing. What it did do was prove what the New York Times calls “The launching pad and testing ground for internet start up companies.” is actually the largest multi-day social event in Interactive. For the 25,000+ PR pushers, IT staffers and Social media gurus, SXSW is the one time per year where their anonymous keystrokes actually connect with living breathing people. Its an exciting experience, really. The personalities and brands that only exist in the ether are all represented in tangible reality. Google, bought out an entire neighborhood to create a theme park of Android apps and tech chat rooms. The cottages and bars of Rainey Street each took on a Google product and offered a lounge/storefront for the the normally cloistered techs who often live a solitary life. That’s the primary takeaway from the event. Whether its reading the placards pasted to the pedicabs for apps like Uberlife, to pick up sports at the Nike space or simply bumping into Highlight’s bull dog on Sixth street, attendees and wanders make physical contact. A rare thing in a primarily pixel and promotion-based world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://m4blog.com"><img src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Highlight-dog-300x168.png" alt="SXSW Highlight BullDog" title="Highlight dog" width="300" height="168" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-59" /></a></p>
<p>The annual tech pilgrimage to Austin known as SXSW interactive did not turn out to be the launch pad for the next big thing. What it did do was prove what the New York Times calls “The launching pad and testing ground for internet start up companies.” is actually the largest multi-day social event in Interactive.</p>
<p>For the 25,000+ PR pushers, IT staffers and Social media gurus, SXSW is the one time per year where their anonymous keystrokes actually connect with living breathing people.</p>
<p>Its an exciting experience, really. The personalities and brands that only exist in the ether are all represented in tangible reality.  Google, bought out an entire neighborhood to create a theme park of Android apps and tech chat rooms. The cottages and bars of Rainey Street each took on a Google product and offered a lounge/storefront for the the normally cloistered techs who often live a solitary life.</p>
<p>That’s the primary takeaway from the event.  Whether its reading the placards pasted to the pedicabs for apps like Uberlife, to pick up sports at the Nike space or simply bumping into Highlight’s bull dog on Sixth street, attendees and wanders make physical contact. A rare thing in a primarily pixel and promotion-based world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-2012-what-did-you-miss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#sxsw. 5 Austin Local Classics:</title>
		<link>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-5-austin-local-classics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sxsw-5-austin-local-classics</link>
		<comments>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-5-austin-local-classics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mind4marketing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not the tourist joints. If you&#8217;re at #sxsw don&#8217;t miss these 5 Austin classics:. So. Congress Cafe, Cisco&#8217;s Bakery, Dirty Martins Burger Joint, Top Notch, Hoffbrau Steaks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/SXSW-02.png"><img src="http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/SXSW-02-300x214.png" alt="" title="SXSW-02" width="300" height="214" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-50" /></a></p>
<p>Not the tourist joints. If you&#8217;re at #sxsw don&#8217;t miss these 5 Austin classics:. So. Congress Cafe, Cisco&#8217;s Bakery, Dirty Martins Burger Joint, Top Notch, Hoffbrau Steaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://02daba5.netsolhost.com/blog1/sxsw-5-austin-local-classics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

